Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

mySPSCC | Employees | Directory

SPSCC logo

Library Research Guides

Public speaking: Credible information

A word on selecting sites

.edu sites: Many .edu sites upload students' papers. .Edu doesn't necessarily mean it's good for academic research. Can the person be considered an expert on the subject?

.org sites: .org sites often have a political, social, economic, or cultural agenda. This means they are biased, which is not necessarily a bad thing as long as you are aware of the bias, you look at opposing viewpoints, and you avoid ridiculously biased, close-minded people. Look for an "About us" page to learn about the organization's purpose. 

Credibility checklist

Reliable Sources

Authors: Can they be considered an expert in the field? Why? Do they have a reputation for credible information?

Tone: Avoid sources with an emotional tone or overt bias (such as Fox News or MSNBC news).

Purpose: Does the source just provide information? Is the author trying to be persuasive? Are there commercial interests? Is it politically, religiously, or socially biased?

Publisher: Does the publisher have a good reputation for credible information? You can often read about a publication's reputation on Wikipedia.

Editorial process: Is somebody checking the information for accuracy?

References: Does the author cite sources? It doesn't have to be a bibliography. S/he can cite them in the text.